Clausen v. DOTSON CO.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Clausen v. DOTSON CO.

621 N.W.2d 459, 2001 WL 68363

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 17, 2001

DocketC0-00-1864

StatusPublished

This text of 621 N.W.2d 459 (Clausen v. DOTSON CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clausen v. DOTSON CO., 621 N.W.2d 459, 2001 WL 68363 (Mich. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

621 N.W.2d 459 (2001)

Roger D. CLAUSEN, Relator,
v.
The DOTSON COMPANY, and American Mutual Liability Ins. Co./Minn. Insurance Guaranty Association/MIGA, Respondents,
Continental Machines, Inc., and Reliance Insurance Company, Respondents,
D.C. Hey Company, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents, and
Special Compensation Fund.

No. C0-00-1864.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 17, 2001. Rehearing Denied February 14, 2001.

Roger D. Calusen, Mankato, MN, Pro Se.

Cousineau, McGuire & Anderson, John T. Thul, Minneapolis, for Respondents Continental Machines' and Reliance Ins. Co.'s.

Abrams & Smith, Paul R. Smith, Minneapolis, for Respondents Dotson Company's and MIGA.

Conley & Borgeson, Steven C. Gilmore, St. Paul, for Respondents D.C. Hey Co.'s and Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.'s.

Special Compensation Fund, Workers' Compensation Division, St. Paul, for Respondent Special Compensation Fund's.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

*460 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 26, 2000, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 136.01, subd. 1(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI