Clausen v. Clausen

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 13, 2018·No. 5D16-4114·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

WAYNE R. CLAUSEN,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v. Case No. 5D16-4114

SUSAN A. CLAUSEN,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 17, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Mark J. Hill, Judge.

John N. Bogdanoff and Shannon McLin Carlyle, of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, Orlando, for Appellant/Cross- Appellee.

Andrew Graf and Dusty Twyman, of Rohe Twyman, P.A., Winter Garden, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Clausen (the Former Husband) appeals the final judgment of dissolution of

marriage entered by the trial court, and Susan Clausen (the Former Wife) cross-appeals.

We affirm without discussion all issues raised in the appeal and all issues raised in the

cross-appeal, except issues related to the alimony award. As to that award, we reverse

and remand for further proceedings because the trial court erred in failing to include income imputed to the Former Wife in its calculations and erred in failing to consider the

child-related expenses being incurred by the Former Husband.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clausen v. Clausen, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Clausen v. Clausen (Clausen v. Clausen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.