Clausen v. Clausen
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
WAYNE R. CLAUSEN,
Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v. Case No. 5D16-4114
SUSAN A. CLAUSEN,
Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
________________________________/
Opinion filed August 17, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Mark J. Hill, Judge.
John N. Bogdanoff and Shannon McLin Carlyle, of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, Orlando, for Appellant/Cross- Appellee.
Andrew Graf and Dusty Twyman, of Rohe Twyman, P.A., Winter Garden, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
PER CURIAM.
Wayne Clausen (the Former Husband) appeals the final judgment of dissolution of
marriage entered by the trial court, and Susan Clausen (the Former Wife) cross-appeals.
We affirm without discussion all issues raised in the appeal and all issues raised in the
cross-appeal, except issues related to the alimony award. As to that award, we reverse
and remand for further proceedings because the trial court erred in failing to include income imputed to the Former Wife in its calculations and erred in failing to consider the
child-related expenses being incurred by the Former Husband.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.
PALMER, ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clausen v. Clausen (Clausen v. Clausen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.