Claudio v. Miami Aerospace Academy, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Claudio v. Miami Aerospace Academy, Inc.

291 So. 2d 72, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7847

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 12, 1974

DocketNo. 73-591

StatusPublished

This text of 291 So. 2d 72 (Claudio v. Miami Aerospace Academy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claudio v. Miami Aerospace Academy, Inc., 291 So. 2d 72, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7847 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this action for damages for personal injury received by the plaintiff-appellant Fabiola Claudio, in which plaintiffs alleged negligence and the defendant pleaded contributory negligence, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant and the plaintiffs appealed.

The evidence before the court at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment, which was a discovery deposition of the injured plaintiff, did not show conclusively that genuine issues of material fact did not exist. The deposition testimony did not conclusively establish the absence of negligence but tended to support the allegation thereof, and it did not establish that the injured plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. See Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40.

The summary judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. See Hoffman v. Jones, Fla.1973, 280 So.2d 431; Butler v. Woolco Department Store, Fla.App. 1973, 284 So.2d 434.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this action for damages for personal injury received by the plaintiff-appellant Fabiola Claudio, in which plaintiffs alleged negligence and the defendant pleaded contributory negligence, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant and the plaintiffs appealed.

The evidence before the court at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment, which was a discovery deposition of the injured plaintiff, did not show conclusively that genuine issues of material fact did not exist. The deposition testimony did not conclusively establish the absence of negligence but tended to support the allegation thereof, and it did not establish that the injured plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. See Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40.

The summary judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. See Hoffman v. Jones, Fla.1973, 280 So.2d 431; Butler v. Woolco Department Store, Fla.App. 1973, 284 So.2d 434.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 So. 2d 72, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claudio-v-miami-aerospace-academy-inc-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack