Claudio v. Claudio

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Claudio v. Claudio

702 So. 2d 1360, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14586, 1997 WL 786736

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 24, 1997

DocketNo. 97-618

StatusPublished

This text of 702 So. 2d 1360 (Claudio v. Claudio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claudio v. Claudio, 702 So. 2d 1360, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14586, 1997 WL 786736 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record in this case is insufficient to support the upward deviation from the $896.00 per month child support guideline that applies in this case. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1995). Accordingly, on remand, the trial court is directed to modify its order so as to only require the Former Husband to pay the guideline amount of $896.00 per month. In addition, the record does not reflect that the Former Husband has the ability to pay the Former Wife’s attorney’s fees. Therefore, on remand, the trial court is directed to modify its order to reflect that each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees. In all other respects, the order under review is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The record in this case is insufficient to support the upward deviation from the $896.00 per month child support guideline that applies in this case. See § 61.30, Fla. Stat. (1995). Accordingly, on remand, the trial court is directed to modify its order so as to only require the Former Husband to pay the guideline amount of $896.00 per month. In addition, the record does not reflect that the Former Husband has the ability to pay the Former Wife’s attorney’s fees. Therefore, on remand, the trial court is directed to modify its order to reflect that each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees. In all other respects, the order under review is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

702 So. 2d 1360, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14586, 1997 WL 786736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claudio-v-claudio-fladistctapp-1997.