Claudia Williams v. Daimlerchrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, F/K/A DCFS Trust

Court of Appeals of Texas

Claudia Williams v. Daimlerchrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, F/K/A DCFS Trust

DecidedJanuary 17, 2008

Docket13-07-00482-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Claudia Williams v. Daimlerchrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, F/K/A DCFS Trust (Claudia Williams v. Daimlerchrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, F/K/A DCFS Trust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claudia Williams v. Daimlerchrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, F/K/A DCFS Trust, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-07-00482-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________________________

CLAUDIA WILLIAMS, Appellant,

v.

DAIMLERCHRYSLER FINANCIAL SERVICES

AMERICAS LLC, F/K/A DCFS TRUST, Appellee.

_______________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This matter is before the Court on a defective notice of appeal and appellant's failure to correct the defect. On August 2, 2007, the Court advised appellant that the notice of appeal was not in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1(d) (2) and requested correction of this defect within ten days. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d), 37.1, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant failed to respond to the Court's directive.

On September 13, 2007, the Court again advised appellant that the notice of appeal was not in compliance with the appellate rules, and informed appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not cured after the expiration of ten days from the date of receipt of the Court's notice. Appellant has failed to correct the defect or otherwise respond to the Court's notices.

On its own motion, with ten days notice to the parties, an appellate court may dismiss a civil appeal for want of prosecution or failure to comply with a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and failure to comply with a notice from the Court. See id.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 17th day of January, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-07-00482-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________________________

CLAUDIA WILLIAMS, Appellant,

v.

DAIMLERCHRYSLER FINANCIAL SERVICES

AMERICAS LLC, F/K/A DCFS TRUST, Appellee.

_______________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This matter is before the Court on a defective notice of appeal and appellant's failure to correct the defect. On August 2, 2007, the Court advised appellant that the notice of appeal was not in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1(d) (2) and requested correction of this defect within ten days. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d), 37.1, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant failed to respond to the Court's directive.

On September 13, 2007, the Court again advised appellant that the notice of appeal was not in compliance with the appellate rules, and informed appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not cured after the expiration of ten days from the date of receipt of the Court's notice. Appellant has failed to correct the defect or otherwise respond to the Court's notices.

On its own motion, with ten days notice to the parties, an appellate court may dismiss a civil appeal for want of prosecution or failure to comply with a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and failure to comply with a notice from the Court. See id.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 17th day of January, 2008.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Claudia Williams v. Daimlerchrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, F/K/A DCFS Trust, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claudia-williams-v-daimlerchrysler-financial-servi-texapp-2008.