Claudia Susana Martinez Jardon v. Gerd Pfister
This text of Claudia Susana Martinez Jardon v. Gerd Pfister (Claudia Susana Martinez Jardon v. Gerd Pfister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ CLAUDIA SUSANA MARTINEZ No. 08-17-00183-CV JARDON, § Appellant, Appeal from the § v. 65th District Court § GERD PFISTER, of El Paso County, Texas Appellee. § (TC# 2013DCM4404)
JUDGMENT
The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in that
part of the judgment awarding attorney’s fees and expenses. We therefore reverse the portion of
the trial court’s judgment regarding attorney’s fees and expenses and remand the case to the trial
court for further proceedings limited to Appellee’s claim of attorney’s fees and expenses.
We further order that the remainder of the judgment of the court below is affirmed, in
accordance with the opinion of this Court.
We further order that Appellee recover from Appellant and her sureties, if any, for
performance of the judgment and all costs, for which let execution issue. See TEX. R. APP. P.
43.5. This decision shall be certified below for observance.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019.
GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice
Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Claudia Susana Martinez Jardon v. Gerd Pfister, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claudia-susana-martinez-jardon-v-gerd-pfister-texapp-2019.