Claudia Arellano v. Isaac Menendez
This text of Claudia Arellano v. Isaac Menendez (Claudia Arellano v. Isaac Menendez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Claudia Arellano v. Isaac Menendez
Appellate case number: 01-22-00409-CV
Trial court case number: 2015-52596
Trial court: 246th District Court of Harris County
Appellant Claudia Arellano filed a Motion for Substitution of Counsel on December 21, 2022. The motion does not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5(b). That is, the motion does not state it was “delivered to the party in person or mailed–both by certified and by first-class mail–to the party at the party’s last known address.” In addition, the motion does not contain the certificate of conference required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5). Accordingly, the motion is denied without prejudice to refiling. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), 10.1(a)(5). It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy Acting individually
Date: January 5, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Claudia Arellano v. Isaac Menendez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claudia-arellano-v-isaac-menendez-texapp-2023.