Claude Eldridge IV Dba Pro Masters Collison v. Johnson Paint Supply

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 18, 2011
Docket14-11-00523-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Claude Eldridge IV Dba Pro Masters Collison v. Johnson Paint Supply (Claude Eldridge IV Dba Pro Masters Collison v. Johnson Paint Supply) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claude Eldridge IV Dba Pro Masters Collison v. Johnson Paint Supply, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 18, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00523-CV

CLAUDE ELDRIDGE IV, D/B/A PRO MASTERS COLLISION, Appellant

V.

JOHNSON PAINT SUPPLY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-18776

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed April 1, 2011.  No motion for new trial was filed.  Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until June 1, 2011.

An appellant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed when the appellant has not filed a timely motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or request for findings of fact and conclusion of law.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely.  Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3 permits an appellant to file a motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.  A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period provided by rule 26.3.  See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to rule 26).  Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the fifteen-day period provided by rule 26.3, however.

On July 21, 2011, notification was transmitted to all parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).  Appellant filed no response.

The appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Jamison.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Claude Eldridge IV Dba Pro Masters Collison v. Johnson Paint Supply, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claude-eldridge-iv-dba-pro-masters-collison-v-john-texapp-2011.