Claude E. Holmes v. Department of Defense
This text of 22 F.3d 1106 (Claude E. Holmes v. Department of Defense) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
22 F.3d 1106
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Claude E. HOLMES, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Respondent.
No. 94-3200.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 29, 1994.
60 M.S.P.R. 592.
DISMISSAL VACATED AND PETITION REINSTATED.
ORDER
Petitioner having paid the required filing fee, and having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is
ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.
The certified list is due on or before May 9, 1994.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F.3d 1106, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6881, 1994 WL 121025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claude-e-holmes-v-department-of-defense-cafc-1994.