Claude Dale Beavers v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 30, 2008
Docket12-08-00201-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Claude Dale Beavers v. State (Claude Dale Beavers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claude Dale Beavers v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NO. 12-08-00201-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

CLAUDE DALE BEAVERS, § APPEAL FROM THE THIRD APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant was initially convicted of delivery of a controlled substance in an amount less than one gram, and placed on community supervision. His community supervision was revoked on April 9, 2008, and he was sentenced to confinement for two years in a state jail facility. Appellant timely filed his notice of appeal. To be sufficient to invoke the appellate court’s full jurisdiction, the notice of appeal filed by an appellant in a criminal case must bear the trial court’s certification of the appellant’s right to appeal. TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). If not included in the notice of appeal, the certification may be furnished by timely amendment or supplementation to the record. TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). Appellant’s notice of appeal does not bear the requisite certification. On June 11, 2008, this court notified Appellant, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 37.1 and 44.3, that the notice of appeal does not include the trial court certification. The notice also informed Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless, on or before June 26, 2008, the clerk’s record was amended to include the required certification. The deadline for responding to this court’s notice has expired, and the clerk’s record has not been amended to show Appellant’s right to appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered June 30, 2008. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Claude Dale Beavers v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claude-dale-beavers-v-state-texapp-2008.