Claude C. Carnes v. National Labor Relations Board

Third Circuit

Claude C. Carnes v. National Labor Relations Board

182 F.2d 940, 26 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2229, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3587

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 2, 1950

Docket10139

StatusPublished

This text of 182 F.2d 940 (Claude C. Carnes v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claude C. Carnes v. National Labor Relations Board, 182 F.2d 940, 26 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2229, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3587 (3d Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner asks us to review the action of the respondent in dismissing his complaint against National Electric Products Corporation. An examination of the record discloses ample evidence to support the respondént’s finding that the petitioner was not discharged by National Electric Products Corporation because of his activities in behalf of United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America, C.I.O., and other concerted activities, and that said corporation, therefore, did not. violate Section 8(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §.158(a) (1, 3), as alleged in the petitioner’s complaint. The order of the respondent' dismissing the petitioner’s complaint will accordingly be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner asks us to review the action of the respondent in dismissing his complaint against National Electric Products Corporation. An examination of the record discloses ample evidence to support the respondént’s finding that the petitioner was not discharged by National Electric Products Corporation because of his activities in behalf of United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America, C.I.O., and other concerted activities, and that said corporation, therefore, did not. violate Section 8(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §.158(a) (1, 3), as alleged in the petitioner’s complaint. The order of the respondent' dismissing the petitioner’s complaint will accordingly be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 F.2d 940, 26 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2229, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claude-c-carnes-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca3-1950.