Classical & Innovative Designs, Inc. v. BH Developers, LLC
This text of Classical & Innovative Designs, Inc. v. BH Developers, LLC (Classical & Innovative Designs, Inc. v. BH Developers, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 5, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D24-0406 Lower Tribunal No. 14-27158
Classical & Innovative Designs, Inc., Appellant,
vs.
BHC Developers, LLC, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Guzman and Mavel Ruiz, Judges.
Kawel PLLC and Andrew Paul Kawel, for appellant.
Siegfried Rivera and Stuart Sobel; Bennett Aiello Kreines and Jeremy R. Kreines, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See O'Neal v. Darling, 321 So. 3d 309, 113 (Fla. 3d DCA
2021) (citing Better Constr., Inc. v. Camacho Enters., Inc., 311 So. 2d 766,
767 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)) (“[W]here the judge rendering a final judgment is
not available to hear a motion for new trial or for rehearing, a hearing and
ruling thereon by another or successor judge is not appropriate, . . . the
proper procedure is to seek an appellate review of the judgment.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Classical & Innovative Designs, Inc. v. BH Developers, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/classical-innovative-designs-inc-v-bh-developers-llc-fladistctapp-2025.