Classical Gardens Ltd. v. Monroe

Missouri Court of Appeals

Classical Gardens Ltd. v. Monroe

872 S.W.2d 184, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 475, 1994 WL 88405

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 22, 1994

DocketNo. 64266

StatusPublished

This text of 872 S.W.2d 184 (Classical Gardens Ltd. v. Monroe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Classical Gardens Ltd. v. Monroe, 872 S.W.2d 184, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 475, 1994 WL 88405 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

CRANDALL, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff, Classical Gardens Limited, appeals from a judgment entered, in a court-tried case in favor of defendant, Melody Monroe. Plaintiffs action was premised on breach of an oral contract. Plaintiff claims the trial court erred in entering judgment in favor of defendant. We affirm.

It is plaintiffs duty to file a transcript and to prepare a legal file so that the record contains all of the necessary evidence needed in making our determination. Frasher by Autenrieth v. Whitsell, 832 S.W.2d 18, 19 (Mo.App.W.D.1992); Rule 81.12(c). Here, plaintiff failed to provide this Court with a transcript of the trial court proceeding. Because of the absence of a transcript we find that plaintiff failed to show any trial court error. Plaintiffs point is denied.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

REINHARD and CRIST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI