Classen v. Elmendorf
37 S.W. 1062, 90 Tex. 204, 1896 Tex. LEXIS 462
Opinions
This case comes to us upon a certificate of dissent from the Court of Civil Appeals of the Fourth Supreme Judicial District. Having examined the question upon which the judges of that court differed, we are of the opinion, that the decision of the court is correct. The grounds for this conclusion are well stated by Chief Justice James, who wrote for the majority of the court, and we have nothing to add to that opinion.
Our conclusion will be so certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Classen v. Elmendorf, 37 S.W. 1062, 90 Tex. 204, 1896 Tex. LEXIS 462 (Tex. 1896).
37 S.W. 1062 (Classen v. Elmendorf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Biggers v. Continental Bus System, Inc.
303 S.W.2d 359 (Texas Supreme Court, 1957)
Glenn v. Dallas County Bois D'Arc Island Levee Dist.
282 S.W. 339 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Groves
97 S.W. 1084 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1906)
Elmendorf v. Classen
49 S.W. 1043 (Texas Supreme Court, 1899)