Clason v. Church
1 Johns. Cas. 29
Opinion
The court adopt the English con- [*30] solidation rule, and will not permit the plaintiffs to prescribe any other.
Rule granted.
S. C. Colem, 62. In New York the common law power to consolidate actions between the same parties for causes of action which may be joined is confirmed by statute ; 2 R. S. 383, § 36. See also 2 Chit. Archb. 830. Graham’s Frac. 2d edit. 502 ; but aliter as to actions upon different policies though on the same risk. Camman v. N. Y. Ins. Co. 1 Caines’ R. 114.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clason v. Church, 1 Johns. Cas. 29 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
1 Johns. Cas. 29 (Clason v. Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Knight Bros. v. Ogden Bros.
3 Tenn. Ch. R. 409 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1877)
Viele v. Germania Insurance
26 Iowa 9 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1868)
Burnham v. Dalling
16 N.J. Eq. 310 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1863)