Clary v. Thomas
This text of 103 Mass. 44 (Clary v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The objection of variance between the declaration and the proof, which is the only one argued, is not supported by the case stated in the bill of exceptions. The practice act provides that “ all written instruments, except policies of insurance, shall be declared on by setting out a copy or such part as is relied on, or the legal effect thereof, with proper averments tc describe the cause of action.” Gen. Sts. c. 129, § 2, cl. 9. The declaration in this ease sets out a copy of the note made by the [45]*45defendant, and the legal effect of its indorsement to the plaintiff. The note and indorsement offered in evidence corresponded with the declaration. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 Mass. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clary-v-thomas-mass-1869.