Clary v. Thomas

103 Mass. 44
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 Mass. 44 (Clary v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clary v. Thomas, 103 Mass. 44 (Mass. 1869).

Opinion

Gray, J.

The objection of variance between the declaration and the proof, which is the only one argued, is not supported by the case stated in the bill of exceptions. The practice act provides that “ all written instruments, except policies of insurance, shall be declared on by setting out a copy or such part as is relied on, or the legal effect thereof, with proper averments tc describe the cause of action.” Gen. Sts. c. 129, § 2, cl. 9. The declaration in this ease sets out a copy of the note made by the [45]*45defendant, and the legal effect of its indorsement to the plaintiff. The note and indorsement offered in evidence corresponded with the declaration. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ward v. Clay
23 P. 50 (California Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 Mass. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clary-v-thomas-mass-1869.