Clary v. State

1911 OK CR 333, 115 P. 1126, 6 Okla. Crim. 597, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 281
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 23, 1911·No. No. A-581.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the Seminole county court at the October, 1909, term, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of one hundred fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days. The record in this ease discloses the fact that this was a very strenuous trial. The trial judge seems to have overlooked the fact that it was his duty to preside in a fair and impartial manner, and in a great many ways he was guilty of conduct prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiff in error. It would be a gross miscarriage of* justice to permit a conviction to stand, had under proceedings as are disclosed by this record. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clary v. State, 1911 OK CR 333, 115 P. 1126, 6 Okla. Crim. 597, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 281 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

1911 OK CR 333 (Clary v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garnett v. State
1918 OK CR 189 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)