Clary v. Hoagland
13 Cal. 173
This text of 13 Cal. 173 (Clary v. Hoagland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clary v. Hoagland, 13 Cal. 173 (Cal. 1859).
Opinion
Baldwin, J. concurring.
[175]*175In this case, as the application for a certiorari shows upon its face that the party has an adequate legal remedy, by appeal, from any judgment which may be rendered in the County Court to his prejudice, the petition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Superior Court
136 P. 538 (California Court of Appeal, 1913)
Olcese v. Justice's Court of the First Judicial Twp.
103 P. 317 (California Supreme Court, 1909)
Chapman v. Justice Court of Tonopah Township
29 Nev. 154 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1906)
Stuttmeister v. Superior Court
12 P. 270 (California Supreme Court, 1886)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 Cal. 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clary-v-hoagland-cal-1859.