Claro-Agustin v. Holder

490 F. App'x 919
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 21, 2012
Docket08-70708
StatusUnpublished

This text of 490 F. App'x 919 (Claro-Agustin v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claro-Agustin v. Holder, 490 F. App'x 919 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Julian Claro-Agustin, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Vasquez de Alcan-tar v. Holder, 645 F.3d 1097, 1099 (9th Cir.2011), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency properly concluded that Cla-ro-Agustin was ineligible for cancellation of removal because he lacked seven years of continuous residence in the United States after being “admitted in any status.” See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(2); Vasquez de Alcantar, 645 F.3d at 1102-03 (an applicant for adjustment of status who entered without inspection is not admitted in any status until his application is approved).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vasquez De Alcantar v. Holder
645 F.3d 1097 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
490 F. App'x 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claro-agustin-v-holder-ca9-2012.