Clarkson v. Cantey

16 S.C.L. 312
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 15, 1824·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Huger.

The legislature in allowing interest on all judgments, intended to furnish an inducement to judgment creditors to indulge their debtors. This inducement would be much diminished, if the interest as well as principal were not secured by the judgment. The subsequent judgment creditor is not placed in. a worse situation by allowing interest, (which is only an equivalent for the use of the principal) than he would be if the senior execution were enforced as soon as lodged; a result which would generally follow, if the interest as well as principal were not secured by the judgment. In similar cases interest has never been separated from principal. The motion is refused.

Mott, Johnson, Richardson, and Ganit, Justices, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarkson v. Cantey, 16 S.C.L. 312 (S.C. 1824).

16 S.C.L. 312 (Clarkson v. Cantey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.