Clarke v. Webb
This text of 2 Va. 8 (Clarke v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The rule of law as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Braxton v. Winslow, 1 Wash. 31. is well understood and admitted, that, at law, the security of an executor shall not be made liable for a devastavit committed by his principal, until it has been fixed upon him by a suit: but, although this be the case, at law,. yet, surely, a creditor, after a judgment and the return of an execution, “ no effects,” may either proceed against the executors for a devastavit, according to the rule laid down in that case, or may bring his bill in equity to have a discovery of the assets : and such is the present case. The court should'therefore entertain the cause, and settle all disputes between the parties : but, to do this, all the parties, (however remotely concerned in interest,) against whom a decree can be rendered, must be before the Court; and therefore, it was right, in this case, to make Judge Lyons a party. His demurrer must be overruled; and he must be directed to answer. Surely it is unnecessary to cite authorities to prove such plain principles.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Va. 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-webb-va-1807.