Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Clarke v. Urlick

Clarke v. Urlick

266 A.D.2d 177, 697 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11108
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 1, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 177 (Clarke v. Urlick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarke v. Urlick, 266 A.D.2d 177, 697 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Lawrence Marcus appeals from an order of the [178]*178Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated November 20, 1998, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment entered upon his failure to appear or answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant failed to provide a reasonable excuse for his default or a meritorious defense as required by CPLR 5015 in order to obtain vacatur of the judgment (see, Kavanagh v Demitrieus, 259 AD2d 523; Furon Constr. v Velez, 209 AD2d 666). S. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Furon Construction, Inc. v. Velez
209 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Kavanagh v. Demitrieus
259 A.D.2d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D.2d 177, 697 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-urlick-nyappdiv-1999.