Clarke v. United States

898 F.2d 161, 283 U.S. App. D.C. 147, 1989 WL 200896
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 15, 1989·No. No. 88-5439·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, on its own motion, that the Clerk is directed to further withhold issuance of the mandate herein pending disposition by the en banc Court of appellant’s Suggestion of Mootness and Motion to Vacate.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge, files a dissenting statement joined by SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarke v. United States, 898 F.2d 161, 283 U.S. App. D.C. 147, 1989 WL 200896 (D.C. Cir. 1989).

898 F.2d 161 (Clarke v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mahoney v. Babbitt
113 F.3d 219 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)
David A. Clarke v. United States
915 F.2d 699 (D.C. Circuit, 1990)