Clarke v. State

60 S.E.2d 333, 207 Ga. 116, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 403
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 11, 1950·No. No. 17130·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Almand, Justice.

1. The constitutionality of Code § 45-512 was determined adversely to the contentions of the plaintiff in error by the decision of this court in Williams v. State, 206 Ga. 837 (59 S. E. 2d, 384), and the trial court did not err in overruling his demurrer to the indictment charging him with having operated a power-drawn net in violation of that Code section.

2. The questions raised by the assignments of error on an excerpt from the charge of the court, as contained in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, which assignments were predicated on the alleged invalidity of the statute above referred to, are determined adversely [117]*117to the contentions of the plaintiff in error by the ruling made above.

No. 17130. July 11, 1950. Aaron Kravitch, for plaintiff in error. Andrew J. Ryan Jr., Solicitor-General, Sylvan A. Garfunkel, and Herman W. Coolidge, contra.

3. The general grounds of the motion for a new trial, not being argued or insisted on, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarke v. State, 60 S.E.2d 333, 207 Ga. 116, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 403 (Ga. 1950).

60 S.E.2d 333 (Clarke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roseman v. Wright
76 S.E.2d 7 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)