Clarke v. State
765 So. 2d 726, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14524, 1999 WL 982967
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 1999
DocketNo. 99-1035
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 765 So. 2d 726 (Clarke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clarke v. State, 765 So. 2d 726, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14524, 1999 WL 982967 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
We find appellant’s first two issues to be without merit and affirm them without discussion. On the third issue, we also affirm but certify the same question of great public importance as in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D831 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), review granted, No. 95,281, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla. Aug. 23, 1999):
DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POW[727]*727ERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
AFFIRMED; question certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Clarke v. State
777 So. 2d 971 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
765 So. 2d 726, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14524, 1999 WL 982967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.