Clarke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Clarke v. State

765 So. 2d 726, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14524, 1999 WL 982967

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1999·No. No. 99-1035·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find appellant’s first two issues to be without merit and affirm them without discussion. On the third issue, we also affirm but certify the same question of great public importance as in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D831 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), review granted, No. 95,281, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla. Aug. 23, 1999):

DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POW[727] ERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

AFFIRMED; question certified.

BARFIELD, C.J., MINER and ALLEN, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find appellant’s first two issues to be without merit and affirm them without discussion. On the third issue, we also affirm but certify the same question of great public importance as in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D831 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), review granted, No. 95,281, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla. Aug. 23, 1999):

DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POW[727] ERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

AFFIRMED; question certified.

BARFIELD, C.J., MINER and ALLEN, JJ., CONCUR.

Clarke v. State, 765 So. 2d 726, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14524, 1999 WL 982967 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

765 So. 2d 726 (Clarke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related