Clarke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Clarke v. State

659 So. 2d 488, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9034, 1995 WL 504975

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 1995·No. No. 94-2814·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from a judgment and sentence entered after a jury trial finding him guilty of battery and malicious mischief. Appellant also challenges a sentence issued after a finding that he violated probation as a result of the misdemeanor convictions. The only notice of appeal filed in this case relates solely to the misdemeanor convictions. Because no notice has been filed citing the cases in which the appellant’s probation was revoked, we do not have jurisdiction to consider the sentences as to the violations of probation. Bell v. State, 154 Fla. 505, 18 So.2d 361 (1944). We find no error related to the misdemeanor judgment and sentence, and affirm.

ERVIN, WOLF and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from a judgment and sentence entered after a jury trial finding him guilty of battery and malicious mischief. Appellant also challenges a sentence issued after a finding that he violated probation as a result of the misdemeanor convictions. The only notice of appeal filed in this case relates solely to the misdemeanor convictions. Because no notice has been filed citing the cases in which the appellant’s probation was revoked, we do not have jurisdiction to consider the sentences as to the violations of probation. Bell v. State, 154 Fla. 505, 18 So.2d 361 (1944). We find no error related to the misdemeanor judgment and sentence, and affirm.

ERVIN, WOLF and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Clarke v. State, 659 So. 2d 488, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9034, 1995 WL 504975 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

659 So. 2d 488 (Clarke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related