Clarke v. State

544 So. 2d 350, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1449, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 1989 WL 65665
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 16, 1989
DocketNo. 88-3046
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 544 So. 2d 350 (Clarke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarke v. State, 544 So. 2d 350, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1449, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 1989 WL 65665 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

This appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the judgment and sentence as imposed. However, we note once again that court costs were imposed without notice to appellant and a judicial determination of her ability to pay. Such imposition of costs was erroneous despite the absence of a contemporaneous objection. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989). Consequently, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. Ayers v. State, 538 So.2d 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

BOOTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. State
547 So. 2d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
544 So. 2d 350, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1449, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 1989 WL 65665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.