Clarke v. State
This text of 544 So. 2d 350 (Clarke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the judgment and sentence as imposed. However, we note once again that court costs were imposed without notice to appellant and a judicial determination of her ability to pay. Such imposition of costs was erroneous despite the absence of a contemporaneous objection. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989). Consequently, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. Ayers v. State, 538 So.2d 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
544 So. 2d 350, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1449, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 1989 WL 65665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.