Clarke v. State ex rel. Williams

6 G. & J. 288
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 15, 1834·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Dorsey, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We cannot adopt the anomalous character attempted to be given to the bond on which the present action is founded, viz: that it is, as it were, the separate bond of each administrator, in which the securities are bound for both; but the administrators are not responsible the one for the other. Had the administrators designed to place themselves in that attitude, they should have executed separate bonds. By the unequivocal import of the present obligation, which we cannot control, and are not at liberty to depart from, they are jointly and severally answerable, not only each for his own act, but also each for the acts of the other. Concurring in opinion, therefore, with the county court,

JUDGMENT AIHKMID.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarke v. State ex rel. Williams, 6 G. & J. 288 (Md. 1834).

6 G. & J. 288 (Clarke v. State ex rel. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Municipal Court v. Whaley
63 L.R.A. 235 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1903)
Yakel v. Yakel
53 A. 914 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1903)