Clarke v. Schumacher
This text of 223 A.D. 860 (Clarke v. Schumacher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting defendant’s motion for change of venue reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. It affirmatively appears in the affidavit, submitted in support of the motion, that causes of action in Suffolk county are being reached within two months of the term for which they are noticed for trial, while in Queens county they are being reached two and one-half years thereafter. To justify a change of place of trial the Civil Practice Act requires that the ends of justice be promoted as well as the convenience of witnesses, and, as stated by Presiding Justice Hirschberg in Mills v. Sparrow (131 App. Div. 241), “ it has always been held in this department that the ends of justice are- best subserved in that venue where a speedy trial can be had.” (See, also, Quinn v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. [861]*861Co., 88 App. Div. 57.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 A.D. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-schumacher-nyappdiv-1928.