Clarke v. Richmond Behavioral Authority

487 F. App'x 110
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1727
StatusPublished

This text of 487 F. App'x 110 (Clarke v. Richmond Behavioral Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarke v. Richmond Behavioral Authority, 487 F. App'x 110 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Clarke appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims against Defendants alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp.2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Clarke v. Richmond Behavioral Auth., No. 3:10-cv-00861-REP (E.D.Va. May 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
487 F. App'x 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-richmond-behavioral-authority-ca4-2012.