Clarke v. Perry

5 Cal. 58
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1855·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Murray, C. J., concurred

The Probate Court is a Court of special and limited jurisdictions. Most of its general powers belong peculiarly and originally to tlie Court of Chancery, which still retains all of its jurisdiction. Where, therefore, a bill is filed in chancery against an administrator to compel him to account, by one who has not been an actual party to a proceeding or settlement in the Probate Court, he may totally disregard such proceeding or settlement; and although the settlement in the Probate Court is a final settlement, the complainant, who was no party to it, may treat it as a nullity, and proceed to invoke the equitable powers of the District Court, and compel the administrator to a full account. The Court below erred in excluding the evidence offered by the complainant fo sustain the allegations of his bill, and tlie judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarke v. Perry, 5 Cal. 58 (Cal. 1855).

5 Cal. 58 (Clarke v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walls v. Walker
37 Cal. 424 (California Supreme Court, 1869)