Clarke v. Patrick

62 N.W. 284, 60 Minn. 269, 1895 Minn. LEXIS 200
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedFebruary 13, 1895
DocketNo. 9109
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 62 N.W. 284 (Clarke v. Patrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarke v. Patrick, 62 N.W. 284, 60 Minn. 269, 1895 Minn. LEXIS 200 (Mich. 1895).

Opinion

CANTY, J.

This is an action against the defendant as indorser of a negotiable promissory note. The answer admits the making of the note to defendant, and the indorsement of it by him to plaintiff' for a valuable consideration before maturity, as alleged in the complaint; but alleges that the transaction between the parties was a sale by defendant to plaintiff of the note and a mortgage securing' the same, which was evidenced by a written assignment, and that said indorsement was not intended by the parties as a guaranty of payment of the note, but was made merely in aid of said assignment. Such written assignment is not inconsistent with defendant’s liability as indorser, and it is well settled that the legal effect of an indorsement cannot be thus varied by parol. The answer states no defense, and judgment on the pleadings was properly ordered for plantiff.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson Hardware Co. v. Kempf
246 N.W. 663 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1933)
Giltner v. Quirk
155 N.W. 760 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 N.W. 284, 60 Minn. 269, 1895 Minn. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-patrick-minn-1895.