Clarke v. Parks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Clarke v. Parks

23 S.E. 839, 97 Ga. 374

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 2, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 23 S.E. 839 (Clarke v. Parks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clarke v. Parks, 23 S.E. 839, 97 Ga. 374 (Ga. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. A demurrer to, or a motion to strike, a plea on the grounds that it was not in compliance with the pleading act of 1893, and was argumentative and full of surplusage, without specifying how the plea was defective in the respects indicated, was too vague and general, and was, therefore, properly overruled.

[375]*375December 2, 1895.

Complaint on account. Before Judge Westmoreland. City court of Atlanta. March, term, 1895.

T. J. Ripley, for plaintiff.

2. The verdict was warranted by the evidence, and there was no error in denying a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons, C. J.

1. A demurrer to, or a motion to strike, a plea on the grounds that it was not in compliance with the pleading act of 1893, and was argumentative and full of surplusage, without specifying how the plea was defective in the respects indicated, was too vague and general, and was, therefore, properly overruled.

[375]*375December 2, 1895.

Complaint on account. Before Judge Westmoreland. City court of Atlanta. March, term, 1895.

T. J. Ripley, for plaintiff.

2. The verdict was warranted by the evidence, and there was no error in denying a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 S.E. 839, 97 Ga. 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-parks-ga-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack