Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Clarke v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

Clarke v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

157 A.D. 194, 141 N.Y.S. 966, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5901
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 7, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 157 A.D. 194 (Clarke v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarke v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 157 A.D. 194, 141 N.Y.S. 966, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinions

Per Curiam:

The referee properly found the defendant liable for negligence in not using the care which an ordinary person as warehouseman would exercise under the same circumstances. Upon the authority of Robinson v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. (145 App. Div. 391; affd., 203 N. Y. 627) and Hyman v. South Coast Hotel Co. (146 App. Div. 341) the recovery is not limited to $150 for each person. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

All concurred, except Howard, J., dissenting in opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. . the New York Central Hudson River Rd. Co.
97 N.E. 1115 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Robinson v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
145 A.D. 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Hyman v. South Coast Hotel Co.
146 A.D. 341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 A.D. 194, 141 N.Y.S. 966, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1913.