Clarke v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
157 A.D. 194, 141 N.Y.S. 966, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5901
Opinions
The referee properly found the defendant liable for negligence in not using the care which an ordinary person as warehouseman would exercise under the same circumstances. Upon the authority of Robinson v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. (145 App. Div. 391; affd., 203 N. Y. 627) and Hyman v. South Coast Hotel Co. (146 App. Div. 341) the recovery is not limited to $150 for each person. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.
All concurred, except Howard, J., dissenting in opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clarke v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 157 A.D. 194, 141 N.Y.S. 966, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
157 A.D. 194 (Clarke v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. . the New York Central Hudson River Rd. Co.
97 N.E. 1115 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Robinson v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
145 A.D. 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Hyman v. South Coast Hotel Co.
146 A.D. 341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)