Clarke v. Nadel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Clarke v. Nadel

49 A.D.2d 933, 375 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11206

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 933 (Clarke v. Nadel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clarke v. Nadel, 49 A.D.2d 933, 375 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 27, 1973 in favor of defendants, upon a jury verdict after a trial on the issue of liability only. Case remanded to the trial court for (1) a hearing before said court on the issue whether the legend on the bottom of defendant’s Exhibit E (i.e., the material written by the investigating officer in response to Item 23 of this exhibit) was submitted to the jury and (2) a report with findings, which report shall be submitted to this court by November 10, 1975. Appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 27, 1973 in favor of defendants, upon a jury verdict after a trial on the issue of liability only. Case remanded to the trial court for (1) a hearing before said court on the issue whether the legend on the bottom of defendant’s Exhibit E (i.e., the material written by the investigating officer in response to Item 23 of this exhibit) was submitted to the jury and (2) a report with findings, which report shall be submitted to this court by November 10, 1975. Appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 933, 375 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-nadel-nyappdiv-1975.