Clarke v. Moies
This text of 77 Mass. 133 (Clarke v. Moies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bond now sued on is in terms to indemnify the plaintiff against costs. There is nothing tending to show that the costs in this case were not incurred in perfect good faith. These plaintiffs were not bound to act on the opinion or advice which this defendant had taken ; and had a right to defend against the claim of the United States, if in so doing they acted fairly. The defendant’s statement that he would pay his share of the liability, not having been accompanied by an offer to pay any specific sum, but on the contrary coupled with a denial of any liability at all, has no tendency to show that the defence and suit on the bond were unnecessary or improper. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Mass. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-moies-mass-1858.