Clarke v. Lee County Penitentiary

Fourth Circuit

Clarke v. Lee County Penitentiary

225 F. App'x 190

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2007·No. No. 07-6234·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Clarke appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Clarke v. Lee County, No. 7:07-cv00018-gec, 2007 WL 218715 (W.D.Va. Jan. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Clarke appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Clarke v. Lee County, No. 7:07-cv00018-gec, 2007 WL 218715 (W.D.Va. Jan. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Clarke v. Lee County Penitentiary, 225 F. App'x 190 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

225 F. App'x 190 (Clarke v. Lee County Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related