Clarke v. Kerchner
183 S.E.2d 241, 279 N.C. 393, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 814
Opinion
Earline H. CLARKE
v.
Charles E. KERCHNER et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Clark & Tanner, for plaintiff.
Perry C. Henson, Daniel W. Donahue, for defendants Kerchner.
Petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 181 S.E.2d 787. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clarke v. Kerchner, 183 S.E.2d 241, 279 N.C. 393, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 814 (N.C. 1971).
183 S.E.2d 241 (Clarke v. Kerchner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hilker v. Knox
197 S.E.2d 618 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
Floyd v. Jarrell
197 S.E.2d 229 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)