Clarke v. Kent

2 Rec. Co. Ct. 908
CourtNew York County Court, Suffolk County
DecidedApril 30, 1678
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 908 (Clarke v. Kent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Court, Suffolk County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarke v. Kent, 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 908 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1678).

Opinion

Thomas Clarke Mercht plaint. agt William Kent Defdt in an action of defamation, that when sd Kent came to fetch two pipes of [909]*909wine hee bought of sd Clarke, hee said hee would not bee cheated by him, and hath often said the wines hee bought of Clarke were abused, all which is untrue: . . . The Jury . . . found for the Defendt costs of Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Rec. Co. Ct. 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-kent-nysuffolkctyct-1678.