Clarke v. Johnson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Clarke v. Johnson

160 N.W. 180, 164 Wis. 461, 1916 Wisc. LEXIS 84

DecidedDecember 5, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 160 N.W. 180 (Clarke v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clarke v. Johnson, 160 N.W. 180, 164 Wis. 461, 1916 Wisc. LEXIS 84 (Wis. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

WiNsnow, O. J.

The contract of assumption of the mortgage was in fact a contract made by the deceased in his lifetime, and its formal completion by the exchange of deeds under the authority of the county court after Corry’s death created no personal liability on the part of the administrator nor preferred liability against the estate, but simply a liability on an equal footing with other debts contracted by the deceased.

The language of the judgment is not fortunate nor apt, but we think that, taken altogether, it may properly be construed as the circuit judge who signed it construed it, namely, as a judgment neither imposing personal liability on the administrator nor giving the claim for deficiency preference over other debts, but declaring it to be a valid claim against the estate on a par with other claims to be certified to the county court for enforcement.

It is true that there are some provisions of the judgment which seem somewhat out of harmony with this construction, but we regard it as the dominant note.and thought, the more so as it agrees with the law. A critical review of the various provisions would be of no material value. They may be found in the statement of the case.

By the Court. — Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WiNsnow, O. J.

The contract of assumption of the mortgage was in fact a contract made by the deceased in his lifetime, and its formal completion by the exchange of deeds under the authority of the county court after Corry’s death created no personal liability on the part of the administrator nor preferred liability against the estate, but simply a liability on an equal footing with other debts contracted by the deceased.

The language of the judgment is not fortunate nor apt, but we think that, taken altogether, it may properly be construed as the circuit judge who signed it construed it, namely, as a judgment neither imposing personal liability on the administrator nor giving the claim for deficiency preference over other debts, but declaring it to be a valid claim against the estate on a par with other claims to be certified to the county court for enforcement.

It is true that there are some provisions of the judgment which seem somewhat out of harmony with this construction, but we regard it as the dominant note.and thought, the more so as it agrees with the law. A critical review of the various provisions would be of no material value. They may be found in the statement of the case.

By the Court. — Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 N.W. 180, 164 Wis. 461, 1916 Wisc. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-johnson-wis-1916.