Clarke v. Forshay

3 Cal. 290
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Cal. 290 (Clarke v. Forshay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarke v. Forshay, 3 Cal. 290 (Cal. 1853).

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.

A written stipulation between parties litigant, filed in the lower court, to govern the proceedings there, will not be looked into by the appellate court, for the purpose of revising the judgment below, where such stipulation has not been brought to the notice of the court below for its adjudication.

If the appellant has been injured by a disregard of the stipulation, his remedy must first be sought in the court in which it was filed, or in some court of original jurisdiction.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Re Faling Estate
229 P. 694 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cal. 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-forshay-cal-1853.