Clarke v. E.I. Dupont DeNemours & Co.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Arnold Benson Clarke appeals the district court’s orders denying his complaint and amended complaint alleging claims of breach of contract, patent infringement, fraud, conspiracy, and racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clarke v. E.I. Dupont DeNemours, No. 3:12-ev-00711-JAG (E.D. Va. Oct. 22 & Nov. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
515 F. App'x 201 (Clarke v. E.I. Dupont DeNemours & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.