Clarke v. Dunham
4 Denio 262
This text of 4 Denio 262 (Clarke v. Dunham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clarke v. Dunham, 4 Denio 262 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).
Opinion
We do not think the proceedings irregular. The committee should apply to the court of chancery. (Robertson v. Lain, 19 Wend. 649.)
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Moore v. Flagg
137 A.D. 338 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Grant v. Humbert
114 A.D. 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Speck v. Pullman Palace Car Co.
12 N.E. 213 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1887)
Hanley v. Brennan
19 Abb. N. Cas. 186 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1887)
Heard v. Sack
81 Mo. 610 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Denni v. Elliott
60 Tex. 337 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)
Coombs v. Janvier
31 N.J.L. 240 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1865)
Niblo v. Harrison
9 Bosw. 668 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1863)
Ex parte Northington
37 Ala. 496 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1861)
Demilt v. Leonard
11 Abb. Pr. 252 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Hall v. Taylor
8 How. Pr. 428 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
Walker v. Clay
21 Ala. 797 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1852)
King v. Robinson
33 Me. 114 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1851)
Soverhill v. Dickson
5 How. Pr. 109 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Denio 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-dunham-nysupct-1847.