Clarke v. Druet

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Clarke v. Druet

5 F. Cas. 952, 4 Cranch 142

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedMay 15, 1831

StatusPublished

This text of 5 F. Cas. 952 (Clarke v. Druet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clarke v. Druet, 5 F. Cas. 952, 4 Cranch 142 (circtddc 1831).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent)

was of opinion that the affidavit was sufficient, within the rule laid down by this court in the case of Smith v. Watson [Case No. 13,124].

The following cases were referred to: Smith v. Watson [supra]; Jolly v. Rankin [Case No. 7,440]; Bartleman v. Smarr [Id. 1,074]; Traverse v. Hight [Id. 14,151]; Way v. Selby [Id. 17,302]; Dawson v. Boyd [Id. 3,667]; 1 Sell. Pr. 105, 108.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent)

was of opinion that the affidavit was sufficient, within the rule laid down by this court in the case of Smith v. Watson [Case No. 13,124].

The following cases were referred to: Smith v. Watson [supra]; Jolly v. Rankin [Case No. 7,440]; Bartleman v. Smarr [Id. 1,074]; Traverse v. Hight [Id. 14,151]; Way v. Selby [Id. 17,302]; Dawson v. Boyd [Id. 3,667]; 1 Sell. Pr. 105, 108.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 F. Cas. 952, 4 Cranch 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-druet-circtddc-1831.