Clarke v. Curtis

1 Va. 289, 1 Gratt. 289
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided November 15, 1844·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Allen, J.

delivered the opinion of the court.

The court is of opinion, that although it is competent for a court of equity, in a proper case, to sequestrate the rents and profits of mortgaged or incumbered property, where a forfeiture has accrued, and such rents and profits may be necessary to discharge the incumbrances, it is not competent to recover from the mortgagor, or equitable owner in possession, the rents and profits actually received by him, or which accrued before any order of sequestration was made. The court is, therefore, of opinion, that it was improper to injoin the appellant from collecting the rents which had previously accrued, or were about to fall due, for the previous occupation of the incumbered premises; and that there was error in overruling the motion to dissolve the injunction. "

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarke v. Curtis, 1 Va. 289, 1 Gratt. 289 (Va. 1844).

1 Va. 289 (Clarke v. Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clarksburg Casket Co. v. Valleu Undertaking Co.
94 S.E. 549 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1917)
Bristow v. Home Building Co.
20 S.E. 947 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1895)
Childs v. Hurd
9 S.E. 362 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1889)
Wathen ex rel. Goodrum v. Glass
54 Miss. 382 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1877)
Bank of Washington v. Hupp
10 Va. 23 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1853)
Phippen v. Durham
8 Va. 457 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1852)