Clarke v. Comissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Clarke v. Comissioner of Correction

686 A.2d 120, 239 Conn. 945

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 20, 1996·No. SC 15575·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The petitioner Winston Clarke’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 374 (AC 14760), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a habeas corpus petitioner alleging his innocence must show that his claim of innocence is sustained by newly discovered evidence?”

[946] Decided November 20, 1996 James A. Shanley, Jr., special public defender, in support of the petition. Rita M. Shair, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner Winston Clarke’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 374 (AC 14760), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a habeas corpus petitioner alleging his innocence must show that his claim of innocence is sustained by newly discovered evidence?”

[946] Decided November 20, 1996 James A. Shanley, Jr., special public defender, in support of the petition. Rita M. Shair, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Clarke v. Comissioner of Correction, 686 A.2d 120, 239 Conn. 945 (Colo. 1996).

Pincite

686 A.2d 120 (Clarke v. Comissioner of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related