Clarke v. Comissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Clarke v. Comissioner of Correction

686 A.2d 120, 239 Conn. 945

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedNovember 20, 1996

DocketSC 15575

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 686 A.2d 120 (Clarke v. Comissioner of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clarke v. Comissioner of Correction, 686 A.2d 120, 239 Conn. 945 (Colo. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

The petitioner Winston Clarke’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 374 (AC 14760), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a habeas corpus petitioner alleging his innocence must show that his claim of innocence is sustained by newly discovered evidence?”

[946]*946Decided November 20, 1996 James A. Shanley, Jr., special public defender, in support of the petition. Rita M. Shair, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner Winston Clarke’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 374 (AC 14760), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a habeas corpus petitioner alleging his innocence must show that his claim of innocence is sustained by newly discovered evidence?”

[946]*946Decided November 20, 1996 James A. Shanley, Jr., special public defender, in support of the petition. Rita M. Shair, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

686 A.2d 120, 239 Conn. 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-comissioner-of-correction-conn-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack