Clarke v. Clarke
This text of 90 A.D.3d 690 (Clarke v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[691]*691An appellant is obligated “to assemble a proper record on appeal, which must include any relevant transcripts of proceedings before the Supreme Court” (Kruseck v Ross, 82 AD3d 939, 940 [2011]; see CPLR 5525 [a]; 5526; Gorelik v Gorelik, 85 AD3d 859, 860-861 [2011]; Kociubinski v Kociubinski, 83 AD3d 1006, 1007 [2011]; Schwartz v Schwartz, 73 AD3d 1156, 1156-1157 [2010]). The record must also “contain all of the relevant papers that were before the Supreme Court, including the transcript, if any, of the proceedings” (Matison v County of Nassau, 290 AD2d 494, 494 [2002]).
Here, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment which, inter alia, failed to direct the defendant to pay child support arrears, failed to award the plaintiff maintenance, and failed to equitably distribute the value of the defendant’s medical license. However, the plaintiff’s failure to provide this Court with the full transcript of the nonjury trial conducted before the Supreme Court renders the record on appeal inadequate to enable this Court to reach an informed determination on the merits. Thus, the appeal must be dismissed (see Gorelik v Gorelik, 85 AD3d at 861; Kociubinski v Kociubinski, 83 AD3d at 1007; Schwartz v Schwartz, 73 AD3d at 1157). Mastro, A.EJ., Sgroi, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.3d 690, 934 N.Y.2d 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-clarke-nyappdiv-2011.