Clarke v. City of New York

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMarch 6, 2024
Docket1:23-cv-02158
StatusUnknown

This text of Clarke v. City of New York (Clarke v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarke v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

BRIAN A. CLARKE ET AL., Plaintiffs, 23 Civ. 2158 (PAE) -y- ORDER CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On March 5, 2024, the parties wrote to Magistrate Judge Stein, to whom this case was referred for settlement, asking that the settlement conference scheduled for March 13, 2024 be adjourned because they have reached a settlement in principle. Dkt. 32. Judge Stein granted the adjournment request. Dkt. 33. The parties also indicated that they planned to submit a written settlement agreement by March 29, 2024, for the Court’s approval pursuant to Cheeks v. freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 206 (2d Cir. 2105). In light of the impending settlement, the Court hereby adjourns sine die the case management conference scheduled before this Court for March 13, 2024, at 10 a.m. See Dkt. 21. Given Judge Stein’s integral role in facilitating the settlement in this case, the Court also encourages the parties to discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before Magistrate Judge Stein. Should the parties elect this

. option, Judge Stein would resolve the application for approval under Cheeks, rather than recommending a decision to this Court in a Report and Recommendation. Judge Stein would also resolve any additional legal questions that may arise in the case. Any appeal from Judge Stein’s rulings following consent would be directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the same way that an appeal from a District Judge’s decision would be taken.

If both parties consent to proceed before Judge Stein, counsel for the defendant should either email directly or file on ECF a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this order (and also available at https.//www.nysd.uscourts.gov/forms/consent-proceed-us-magistrate-judge). The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED.

Paul A. Engelmaye®” (/ j United States District Judge

Dated: March 6, 2024 New York, New York

AO 85 (Rev. 02/17) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of New York

Plaintiff ) Vv. ) Civil Action No. ee Defendant }

NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Notice of a magistrate judge’s availability, A United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including ajury or nonjury trial) and to order the entry of a final judgment. The judgment may then be appealed directly to the United States court of appeals like any other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily consent.

You may consent to have your case referred to a magistrate judge, or you may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding consent will not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise be involved with your case.

Consent to a magistrate judge's authority. The following parties consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings. Printed names of parties and attorneys Signatures of parties or attorneys Dates

Reference Order IT IS ORDERED: This case is referred to a United States magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73,

ee District Judge ’s signature Paul A. Engelmayer, U.S. District Judge Printed name and title Note: Return this form to the clerk of court only if you are consenting to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States magistrate judge. Do not return this form to a judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.
796 F.3d 199 (Second Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Clarke v. City of New York, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-city-of-new-york-nysd-2024.