Clarke v. Asmus Boysen Mining Co.

268 F. 535, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2347
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 18, 1920
DocketNo. 5356
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 F. 535 (Clarke v. Asmus Boysen Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarke v. Asmus Boysen Mining Co., 268 F. 535, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2347 (8th Cir. 1920).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for rehearing and the application for modification of the decree heretofore ordered are denied, except that the opinion handed down in this case and the decree ordered therein are modified in the respects following, and in those only, to wit:

That the decree of the trial court, denying leave to file the second supplemental petition, be reversed, for the sole purpose of permitting appellant an opportunity to recover any damages arising from deprivation of the property involved, which damages, if any, have arisen since the closing date of the accounting heretofore rendered, and that the amount, if any, of such damages, be considered in striking the balance provided for in the order of this court upon this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clarke v. Boysen
39 F.2d 800 (Tenth Circuit, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 F. 535, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarke-v-asmus-boysen-mining-co-ca8-1920.