Clarke v. Allstate Insurance Company

728 So. 2d 143, 1999 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 35, 1999 WL 36210
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided January 29, 1999·No. 2960938·Published

Opinion

On Remand from the Supreme Court

YATES, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. See Ex parte Clarke, 728 So.2d 135 (Ala.1998). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as to the bad-faith, outrage, and conspiracy claims. It is reversed as to the breach-of-contract, misrepresentation, and suppression claims, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

[144] AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and MONROE, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarke v. Allstate Insurance Company, 728 So. 2d 143, 1999 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 35, 1999 WL 36210 (Ala. Ct. App. 1999).

728 So. 2d 143 (Clarke v. Allstate Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Clarke
728 So. 2d 135 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1998)